[maemo-developers] [cairo] Re: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
From: Daniel Amelang daniel.amelang at gmail.comDate: Tue Jan 16 07:56:01 EET 2007
- Previous message: [cairo] Re: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Improving Cairo performance on the N800
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/15/07, Kalle Vahlman <kalle.vahlman at gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/1/16, Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang at gmail.com>: > > On 1/13/07, Kalle Vahlman <kalle.vahlman at gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2007/1/14, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.kabel.utwente.nl>: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > Siarhei Siamashka schreef: > > > > > On Saturday 13 January 2007 21:00, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > > > > > > > > As for optimizing code for ARM (targeting Nokia 770), there are a few things > > > > > that are slow (maybe this list is still incomplete): > > > > > 1. Floating point math is slow without vfp (cairo contains a lot of fp math) > > > > > > > > Actually not very much if you build it with --disable-some-floatingpoint > > > > > > I didn't (had forgot about the whole flag :), but will do (should be > > > interesting). > > > > That flag doesn't do anything yet, so it shouldn't be interesting :) > > So does grep tell me :) > > I guess all the improvements I thought were under that flag were in > fact general improvements... Which is better, I guess. That's right. We haven't yet made an improvement for FPU-less platforms that resulted in a perceptible loss on others. The time may come, though, so the flag remains. Dan
- Previous message: [cairo] Re: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Improving Cairo performance on the N800
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]