[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Ignored patches, ignored bugs
From: Marius Vollmer marius.vollmer at nokia.comDate: Wed Jan 24 13:53:53 EET 2007
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Ignored patches, ignored bugs
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Ignored patches, ignored bugs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"ext maemo-developers-bounces at maemo.org" <maemo-developers-bounces at maemo.org> writes: > Maybe the list of important bugs for hildon-fm is just too long to get > the easy patches fixed right now ;) Yep, the C++ bindings are unfortunately pretty low priority for me. As far as language bindings go, C++ doesn't need them (people can just use the C API from C++). Also, my general attitude is that the wrappers should be flexible enough to work around buglets in the wrapped code. We are talking about this patch to hildon-fm, right? --- hildon-fm/hildon-file-system-model.h (revision 1305) +++ hildon-fm/hildon-file-system-model.h (working copy) @@ -96,10 +96,12 @@ typedef struct _HildonFileSystemModelPrivate HildonFileSystemModelPrivate; -typedef struct { +typedef struct _HildonFileSystemModel HildonFileSystemModel; + +typedef struct _HildonFileSystemModel { GObject parent; HildonFileSystemModelPrivate *priv; -} HildonFileSystemModel; +}; I'd say that you should fix the wrapper generator to not be so brittle, or add some way of hinting it around issues like this. Nevertheless, I am going to apply the patch. Eventually. :-)
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Ignored patches, ignored bugs
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Ignored patches, ignored bugs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]