[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Ignored patches, ignored bugs
From: Murray Cumming murrayc at murrayc.comDate: Wed Jan 24 19:11:35 EET 2007
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Ignored patches, ignored bugs
- Next message: [maemo-developers] SDL porting guide
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 15:01 +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
[snip]
> typedef struct _foo foo; struct foo { ... };
>
> for the benefit of C++ bindings? Come on. That seems ill-motivated
> to me.
Every other GObject-based library does this.
[snip]
> > It still doesn't invalidate the need for bindings.
>
> There is no need for C++ bindings. It is nice to have them, tho.
[snip]
This difference between need and nice-to-have is completely subjective.
Many people feel that they need the full capability of C++ to be
productive, and gtkmm is not something that you can just reimplement in
your own application. It's a lot of work.
Code written with gtkmm is really very different to code written for GTK
+, because of all those C++ techniques that are easily available. It's
far more than just syntatic sugar.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc at murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Ignored patches, ignored bugs
- Next message: [maemo-developers] SDL porting guide
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
