[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Ignored patches, ignored bugs
From: Murray Cumming murrayc at murrayc.comDate: Wed Jan 24 19:11:35 EET 2007
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Ignored patches, ignored bugs
- Next message: [maemo-developers] SDL porting guide
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 15:01 +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote: [snip] > typedef struct _foo foo; struct foo { ... }; > > for the benefit of C++ bindings? Come on. That seems ill-motivated > to me. Every other GObject-based library does this. [snip] > > It still doesn't invalidate the need for bindings. > > There is no need for C++ bindings. It is nice to have them, tho. [snip] This difference between need and nice-to-have is completely subjective. Many people feel that they need the full capability of C++ to be productive, and gtkmm is not something that you can just reimplement in your own application. It's a lot of work. Code written with gtkmm is really very different to code written for GTK +, because of all those C++ techniques that are easily available. It's far more than just syntatic sugar. -- Murray Cumming murrayc at murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Ignored patches, ignored bugs
- Next message: [maemo-developers] SDL porting guide
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]