[maemo-developers] Any problem with chinhook beta repo?
From: Juha Kallioinen juha.kallioinen at nokia.comDate: Fri Nov 9 09:42:37 EET 2007
- Previous message: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?
- Next message: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ext Luca Donaggio wrote: > On Nov 8, 2007 4:04 PM, Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof at nokia.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:14 +0100, ext Luca Donaggio wrote: >>> It seems that my sbox target is somewhat misconfigured: it should look >>> in binary-armel subdir on repository.maemo.org, not binary-arm, but I >>> don't have any clue why it happened and how to correct it! >> IIRC, there is a certain combination of scratchbox parameters >> (especially the emulation and/or debkits) that results in the package >> management system thinking that it's on arm rather than armel. I believe >> the fix is to use the correct emulation and/or debkits. >> >> >> >> Gabriel >> > > Thanks Gabriel! > Any clue about how to fix it? I followed these instructions to set up > my sbox environment: > > http://inz.fi/blog/2007/10/22/multi-target-development-for-maemo/ > > My current parameters for chinhook-armel target (via sb-menu -> show) are: > > Compiler: cs2005q3.2-glibc2.5-arm > Architecture: arm > Sub-architecture: arm > C-library: glibc > Devkits: cputransp debian doctools perl debian-sarge > CPU-transparency: /scratchbox/devkits/cputransp/bin/qemu-arm-0.8.1-sb2 > > Apart from the compiler glibc version and debian-sarge among the > devkits, they are the same for my bora-armel target, which works just > fine (no arm/armel mismatch)! Hi Luca, it looks like your target setup is not quite correct. Inz's blog entry is quite new but the information for a chinook target is incorrect. Here's a target setup that works for me: sb-conf st maemo4-arm -c cs2005q3.2-glibc2.5-arm -d cputransp:perl:debian-etch -t qemu-arm-0.8.2-sb2 The most notable differences are that you should use debian-etch devkit (not debian or debian-sarge) and that the qemu version is wrong. Also make sure you've got the latest version of scratchbox and the devkits: scratchbox-core 1.0.8 scratchbox-libs 1.0.8 scratchbox-devkit-cputransp 1.0.3 scratchbox-devkit-debian 1.0.9 scratchbox-devkit-doctools 1.0.7 scratchbox-devkit-maemo3 1.0.1 scratchbox-devkit-perl 1.0.4 The maemo3 devkit is named very badly, but it provides the maemo3-tools that has some additional tools you also might also want to use in chinook (maemo4). I don't know if this fixes your specific problem, but I hope so :-) Cheers, Juha -- Juha Kallioinen JID: kaltsi at ok
- Previous message: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?
- Next message: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]