[maemo-developers] Repositories mess: conclusions and actions

From: Neil Jerram neil at ossau.uklinux.net
Date: Sat Nov 10 00:13:07 EET 2007
rael at edge.ping.de writes:

> Sorry, that is not 100% correct. At least I stressed the need for an 
> autobuilder, too. I think I made that very clear in my mails. And I think 
> most other people were in favour of it, too. IMHO Nobody would deny the 
> advantage. 

"Ferenc Szekely" <ferenc at maemo.org> writes:

> we don't ignore it at all. please follow and commen Misha's thread
> about the autobuilder.
> in case you have a solution then please let us know. we will make sure
> that you can set it up for extras.

I'm sorry if I was overly categorical there.  I have been following
the "repositories mess" discussion, but I haven't read every word of
every post, so I certainly could have missed things.  I feel that with
a working auto-build system, many of the process issues that are being
discussed in fine detail would simply disappear, or at least become
less important; therefore it has seemed odd to me that there is so
much discussion of those issues, and relatively little (till now) of
auto-building.

But, as you say, it looks like this is now being addressed.  Over to
the new auto-builder thread...

Regards,
        Neil


More information about the maemo-developers mailing list