[maemo-developers] extras: autobuilders
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Mon Nov 12 13:08:10 EET 2007
- Previous message: extras: autobuilders
- Next message: extras: autobuilders
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Nov 12, 2007 11:01 AM, Simon Pickering <S.G.Pickering at bath.ac.uk> wrote: > [big snip] > > [...] Then we possibly come back to individuals adding some sort of > build recipe for each library they want (even though lots of them will > be trivial). > > Although having an email address of the person who 'ported' them would > allow error reporting, perhaps a better option here is to setup a > centralised mailing list specifically for these autobuilt packages and > let people submit their bug reports to that - this means that such > reports are out in the open (as is the source and the build recipes) > and would allow more than one person to contribute to any given package > (e.g. if someone is on holiday, or gets bored, etc.) Lots of good discussion, and it's validating the approach currently taken by mud-builder where this kind of thing is done as above. There are trivial recipes for compiling simple upstream libraries, the maintainer is set to a mailing list unless overridden etc. Perhaps it is just process defintiion and automation which unsuitable? I'd desperately love to hear opinions from anyone involved in other auto-builders, particularly in the Debian/Ubuntu world. But... then... I suppose we would generally for this thread. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/
- Previous message: extras: autobuilders
- Next message: extras: autobuilders
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]