[maemo-developers] Ideas for Diablo and Elephanta: OpenEmbedded

From: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com
Date: Mon Sep 24 17:08:13 EEST 2007
On 9/24/07, Simon Pickering <S.G.Pickering at bath.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > >> I would love to see support for OpenEmbedded.
> > >
> > > What would need to be changed on the maemo side to support
> > > OpenEmbedded?  Aren't you rather asking for maemo support in
> > > OpenEmbedded?
> > You are right, maybe this is the proper viewpoint.
> >
> > For maemo 3.2, I could not get a matching toolchain build in
> > OpenEmbedded. I don't tried it with the new glibc, yet, but I assume,
> > such a task would be best addressed by the people who know the
> > toolchain, best.
>
> You should be able to provide your own toolchain (e.g. the Code Sorcery one) and
> simply state in the local.conf (take a look at the way the Zaurus 2.95.x
> cross-toolchain was provided so 5500 kernels could be built) that the toolchain
> is already provided.
>
> I think that the group developing Mamona are effectively using a 'native'
> OpenEmbedded setup within Scratchbox. I don't know how far along they are or
> whether this is a better approach than cross-compiling with OpenEmbedded as I'm
> not really up to speed with OE any more.

Actually, we (from Mamona) are not using the scratchbox neither the
codesourcery toolchain. We are using the pure OpenEmbedded generated
toolchain...

>
>
> Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-developers mailing list
> maemo-developers at maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
>


-- 
Rodrigo Vivi
INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
GPG: 0x905BE242 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net

More information about the maemo-developers mailing list