[maemo-developers] Some autobuilder issues
From: Ed Bartosh eduard.bartosh at nokia.comDate: Wed Aug 6 14:13:04 EEST 2008
- Previous message: Some autobuilder issues
- Next message: Testing application under targets arm and x86
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 11:48 +0400, ext Andrew Zabolotny wrote: > Hello! > > I would like to discuss a couple of topics about the autobuilder here, > and I hope it's okay to do it here rather than in bugzilla, because > they aren't bugs. > > First problem: I tried to upload yesterday the unrar and tar packages to > the autobuilder and while it worked fine for diablo, there was a > problem with the chinook builder. > > The logs are here, for example: > > https://garage.maemo.org/builder/chinook/tar_1.19-3maemo1/ > It seems that you've managed to fix it already, right? > As you can see, there's no gnupg package in chinook sdk. I'm using the > excellent mud-builder tool to build some of my packages, and it uses > dpkg-depcheck to find out the build dependencies. And indeed, gpg is > normally used during a build process - both to check the signature on > source .dsc file and to generate a signature for the binary .dsc file. > > Is it possible to add somehow the gnupg package to chinook sdk > package repositories, or they are frozen forever? I can edit the control > file after every autobuild manually and remove gnupg from there, but > it's an awkward way to do things. > If you need gnupg you can add it to extras[-devel] like any other package. Why it should be added to sdk? > Second issue is with old packages in extras-devel. They are going to > accumulate over the head, the repository (especially the build-logs > directory) is already filled up and this is only going to become worse > with time. Would it be possible to remove a old package version (and its > build logs in garage/builder/ directory) when a newer package version > has been built? > Good point. I think that build directories older than month can be deleted. Regards, -- Ed
- Previous message: Some autobuilder issues
- Next message: Testing application under targets arm and x86
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]