[maemo-developers] Slow operations trough ssh, connected to my N810

[From: william maddler]

time > 10ms sounds strange to me, being on the same network... what if 
you try pinging your AP's IP from both laptop and N810? same results?



Andrea Grandi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this is the ping result:
> 
> andy80 at noteboontu:~$ ping 192.168.0.102
> PING 192.168.0.102 (192.168.0.102) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=9.03 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=69.9 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=283 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=5.71 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=132 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=26.3 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=296 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=218 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=140 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=62.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=292 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=210 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=132 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=54.6 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=281 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=203 ms
> 
> --- 192.168.0.102 ping statistics ---
> 16 packets transmitted, 16 received, 0% packet loss, time 15000ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.718/151.281/296.578/102.465 ms
> 
> both my notebook and my N810 are connected to the same router/access point.
> 
> 2008/2/4, william maddler <news at maddler.net>:
>> Andrea Grandi wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've openssh and ssh client installed on my N810. Sometimes I need to
>>> connect to the N810 using ssh, from my notebook (they're both on the
>>> same lan). Very often I experiment that connection is very very slow
>>> :(
>>>
>>> Cannot understand why...if I open an Xterm on N810 and I execute: ssh
>>> root at localhost, everything looks fast. No process is taking 100% or
>>> something similar....
>>>
>>> Anyone experienced the same problem?
>>>
>> Network lag? What if you try pinging your N810?
>>
> 
>