[maemo-developers] busybox applet selection (again)
From: Damien Moore damienlmoore at gmail.comDate: Tue Jan 1 20:00:55 EET 2008
- Previous message: Frequencies scaling with OS2008
- Next message: busybox applet selection (again)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'd like to bring up the busybox applet selection issue again. This was previously discussed here: http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail//maemo-developers/2007-April/009738.html with associated bug here: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=989 the bug was marked WONTFIX Eero Tamminen's resolution was to not add any additional applets to BusyBox because in his opinion those needs can best be met by creating full versions of the tools in separate packages. I don't think this is a good idea because it creates a proliferation of unnecessarily bloated packages with the attendant problems of maintaining multiple packages (keeping in mind that the target hardware is a capacity constrained tablet). The benefit of busybox is that most appplets add just a few kb to the binary size and all of them sit inside a single binary. My proposal is to create an alternative "essential" busybox package that optionally replaces the default busybox, say "busybox-max". busybox-max would be built with many more applets (more of the archive tools, more shell support (e.g. longer command histories and color coded ls), more networking tools etc. This package would not be installed by default, it would just be an optional package for developers/hackers. I don't know how well dpkg would handle the package replacement but it is worth exploring. thanks, Damien Moore PS: Can someone please tell me where I can obtain the most recent busybox binary and source packages (v1.6.x, I think) that ships with OS2008.
- Previous message: Frequencies scaling with OS2008
- Next message: busybox applet selection (again)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]