[maemo-developers] RFC: Proposal to solve multiple repository, poor QA situation

From: Mikhail Sobolev mss at mawhrin.net
Date: Wed Jan 16 16:29:45 EET 2008
Hi Andrew

On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:35:47PM +0000, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> I'd also be very interested to here
> what Mikhail thinks in light of his integrated promotion interface.
There are two reasons why I created this interface:
 * to complete the plan I proposed some time ago (like 2,5 months ago)
    1. Extras-devel [done]
    2. Promotion Interface [done]
    3. Builder [to do? :)]
    4. Sophisticated promotion rules [your proposal seems to to fit
       here, so I support it :)]

 * I _feel_ this interface might be useful for developers, so they do
   not have to dput here and there and keep those packages signed, etc...

Requested changes/new features will be implemented as long as they are
not overcoming my abilities, however beyond a few to-do items I have not
further plans :))

--
Misha
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20080116/9642ba99/attachment.pgp 
More information about the maemo-developers mailing list