[maemo-developers] Curious: Maemo devices other than Nokia?
From: Tollef Fog Heen tfheen at canonical.comDate: Wed Jan 23 17:07:41 EET 2008
- Previous message: Curious: Maemo devices other than Nokia?
- Next message: Curious: Maemo devices other than Nokia?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
* Tapani Pälli | ext Guillem Jover wrote: | > On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 13:49:19 +0200, ext Tapani Pälli wrote: | > | >> What's the problem? Why we could not have our own custom functionality | >> in our Gtk+ tree? | > | > Huh? Because that's just wrong, it's a layering violation as Riku | > said, and because we are extending the API in an uncoordinated way | > with upstream. Reminds me of embrace and extend... | | Well, I guess there could be times when a distribution needs to extend | package functionality with own patches. It can be done in coordinated way. Yes, the coordinated way is to get it upstream or at least upstream agreeing to such an API change. Extending somebody else's API without permission and without changing the soname is, IMNSHO, quite rude. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
- Previous message: Curious: Maemo devices other than Nokia?
- Next message: Curious: Maemo devices other than Nokia?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]