[maemo-developers] What does Nokia's acquisition of Trolltech mean to Maemo?
From: Murray Cumming murrayc at murrayc.comDate: Thu Jan 31 00:00:18 EET 2008
- Previous message: What does Nokia's acquisition of Trolltech mean to Maemo?
- Next message: What does Nokia's acquisition of Trolltech mean to Maemo?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 21:26 +0100, Klaus Rotter wrote: > Klaus Rotter schrieb: > > Well, it is (to me) more a question of C vs C++. I started with C about > > twenty years ago and liked it a lot. But some of the features of C++ in > > addition with Qt are IMHO more "elegant", if you use a OO toolkit with > > an OO language like C++. E.g. methods overloading (which is really nice). > > Some addition to this: I started programming Qt about 10 years ago with > Qt 1.x. Don't remember exactly. Qt was more or less the reason I started > learning C++. I got used to use some of the features C++ offered, but I > have some problems to read a program which uses a lot of the advanced > C++ features. Meanwhile, I wrote some Java code (starting which Java > 1.0) and found it somewhat easier (at least to understand) compared to > C++. But sometimes I miss pointers. > After this period I started to work with gtk and C (I tried a lot of > other toolkits, eg. FLTK, wxWidgets (version 1), Fox and also Tcl/Tk > with ET). So, when I came back to gtk and C and found some "missing" > features in the object oriented design. gtkmm > So, Vala may be one way to go... > it really looks interesting. -- murrayc at murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com
- Previous message: What does Nokia's acquisition of Trolltech mean to Maemo?
- Next message: What does Nokia's acquisition of Trolltech mean to Maemo?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]