[maemo-developers] Standardization of packages version name in the extra repositories
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Fri Jul 25 15:21:57 EEST 2008
- Previous message: Standardization of packages version name in the extra repositories
- Next message: Standardization of packages version name in the extra repositories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Murray Cumming <murrayc at murrayc.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 11:20 +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote: > [snip] >> * Any package patched, or not from a existing deb source, needs to >> have a maemo version suffix. > > So every single package in extras should have a maemo suffix? No, because some projects will be simple repackages of an upstream package with no additional Maemo patches which aren't available upstream. For example, Maemo Mapper has no Maemo-specific patches and so the upstream version *is* the version of the deb. Similarly, something that's come from (say) mud from an upstream deb without any further patches (probably, typically, CLI apps) would also not have a maemo suffix. However, if the upstream source can't build a Maemo package, or it's a package solely put together for Maemo, it needs a maemo suffix. That's my understanding - hopefully Eero could correct me? Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/
- Previous message: Standardization of packages version name in the extra repositories
- Next message: Standardization of packages version name in the extra repositories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]