[maemo-developers] Fixing bugs the user can't check (was Re: maemo Bug Jar #7)
From: Quim Gil quim.gil at nokia.comDate: Thu Jun 5 12:04:15 EEST 2008
- Previous message: maemo Bug Jar #7
- Next message: maemo Bug Jar #7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, ext Luca Olivetti wrote: > It's useful to know that a bug is fixed, what isn't useful is that the > fix isn't actually available.... In regular free software development a bug is generally solved when the code is implemented and available somewhere. It's up to you to go to the source and compile yourself the bleeding edge or wait until a next release is done. As for today this can be applied only to certain components being developed openly and in real time. Our development model is different for some of the open parts, and is never going to be the same for the rest. A developer will tell you "it's fixed" and you won't always be able to fix it. Still, for the responsible of the bug it is simpler to solve the bug as fixed and move the attention to new bugs. This is even clearer in a bigger scale and in these weekly bug reports, when all we want to see in the top of the lists the bugs that are really not fixed, anywhere. For these reasons it is probably a good idea to resolve the bugs as fixed as soon as someone has implemented the fix. The reporter or whoever else can always reopen the exceptions. -- Quim Gil marketing manager, open source maemo software @ Nokia
- Previous message: maemo Bug Jar #7
- Next message: maemo Bug Jar #7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]