[maemo-developers] maemo Bug Jar #7
From: Dave Neary bolsh at gnome.orgDate: Fri Jun 6 21:16:32 EEST 2008
- Previous message: maemo Bug Jar #7
- Next message: maemo Bug Jar #7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, Krischan Keitsch wrote: > Quality first! Releasing shouldn't _only_ be a management decision. When the > quality is as expected then the (scrum ?) team should hand over the > responsibility to the management. They can then powerpoint the great > event ;-) > Personally I consider fix release dates as contra productive. Quality it the > key to success. While I still think we've wandered miles off topic here, I have to depend good project management practices. Release dates help with decision making - features to keep, features to drop. I agree that quality is a must, of course, but it's not the only parameter - last minute feature additions affect quality, or insisting on doing every feature on a checklist that is established at the start of the planning process. A release date helps you ship a smaller number of high quiality components, rather than spending years getting a required quality level on an ever-expanding feature list. Cheers, Dave. PS. As I understand it, the question here is that some bugs are fixed in the platform, but the patches aren't made available straight away. Have I misunderstood the issue? -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: dneary at maemo.org Jabber: bolsh at jabber.org
- Previous message: maemo Bug Jar #7
- Next message: maemo Bug Jar #7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]