[maemo-developers] maemo Bug Jar #7
From: Andre Klapper aklapper at openismus.comDate: Mon Jun 9 14:24:17 EEST 2008
- Previous message: About release dates (was RE: maemo Bug Jar #7)
- Next message: maemo Bug Jar #7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[an off-topic posting about fixed release dates. please stop reading if not interested.] Am Freitag, den 06.06.2008, 19:48 +0200 schrieb Krischan Keitsch: > Quality first! Releasing shouldn't _only_ be a management decision. When the > quality is as expected then the (scrum ?) team should hand over the > responsibility to the management. They can then powerpoint the great > event ;-) > Personally I consider fix release dates as contra productive. Quality it the > key to success. Depends on the kind of project and your customers. >From my point of view GNOME has also become successful because they were one of the first projects that started publishing based on a predictable schedule (a new major release every half a year). This worked out quite well in the past (though the latest GNOME release, 2.22, was a pretty risky one), and other open source projects have also started to publish schedules (e.g. KDE 4 - no flamewars, please). Customers (=distributions) can reliably plan which version to include and start beta-testing the release candidates of the final GNOME version they plan to include. Fixed release dates can create some pressure to get things done, especially in open source projects that aren't steered by *one* company that pays you (and in worst case could fire you), because you have way less tools to create pressure and motivate volunteers. :-) -andre (GNOME Release Team member) -- Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster)
- Previous message: About release dates (was RE: maemo Bug Jar #7)
- Next message: maemo Bug Jar #7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]