[maemo-developers] Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
From: Niels Breet maemo at breet.comDate: Mon May 5 14:42:33 EEST 2008
- Previous message: Prelinking and GNU Hashstyle on maemo?
- Next message: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all, As you probably all know Diablo, the next revision of the IT OS, is coming out sooner or later. Diablo will be binary compatible with chinook, but there will be two additions. There will be a new email framework and a newer version of libssl (0.9.8) because of requirements for the WiMax tablet. Most applications that work on chinook, should run unchanged on diablo. So developers should not have to change anything in their code to run their chinook application on diablo. In the past we added an extras repository with the corresponding codename for all new OS versions. This was needed, because versions weren't binary compatible. We now have come to the point where the next version _is_ binary compatible. My question to the maemo community is this: Do we need a separate extras repository for diablo or should we just add a link to chinook? By linking the two, developers don't have to upload their packages to both repositories. What do you think? Please give us your ideas, pros/cons. - Niels
- Previous message: Prelinking and GNU Hashstyle on maemo?
- Next message: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]