[maemo-developers] Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
From: Niels Breet maemo at breet.comDate: Mon May 5 15:06:21 EEST 2008
- Previous message: [Conclusion] Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Next message: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, May 5, 2008 13:58, Rafael Proença wrote: >> Do we need a separate extras repository for diablo or should we just >> add a link to chinook? >> > > My guess is that if you link diablo to chinook what will happen is that > all the chinook boxes will be upgraded to diablo, which, I think, is not > ideal and even not compatible even though the binaries are compatible, the > core system will not be (for example, I heard that the user will not have > to reflash the device to upgrade the distribution once they have Diablo > installed). > I think I need to clarify that I was talking about the extras repository here. This is about community created packages in extras. System packages would be served from a different repository. > IMO, the compatibility of binary packages is not the only problem here. > But > the packages' version and are. > > -- > Rafael Proença > https://launchpad.net/~cypherbios > http://www.cypherbios.org/blog > http://www.ubuntu-br.org > > - Niels
- Previous message: [Conclusion] Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Next message: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]