[maemo-developers] Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
From: Marius Vollmer marius.vollmer at nokia.comDate: Mon May 5 18:40:25 EEST 2008
- Previous message: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Next message: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"ext Marcin Juszkiewicz" <openembedded at haerwu.biz> writes: > Does someone work on "apt-get update;apt-get upgrade" from Chinook to > Diablo then? No, unfortunately not. We are working to get apt-get upgrade working for releases that come after Diablo. I agree that a smooth upgrade path is needed: without it, we not only need to keep backwards compatibility (packages created with the Chinook SDK run on Diablo), but also fowards compatibility (packages created with the Diablo SDK run on Chinook). If we have a smooth upgrade patch, we can expect people to upgrade to Diablo and stop supporting Chinook devices. > Or do we are expected to 'use maemo backup, then rsync whole > filesystem, reflash'? For the Chinook to Diablo upgrade, yes.
- Previous message: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Next message: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]