[maemo-developers] Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
From: Marcin Juszkiewicz openembedded at haerwu.bizDate: Tue May 6 17:53:07 EEST 2008
- Previous message: Gecko version? Re: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Next message: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dnia Tuesday, 6 of May 2008, josh.soref at nokia.com napisał: > Graham cobb wrote: > > If there are *any* library changes (you mentioned libssl but > > I *really* hope there will be an up to date version of glib!) > > Perhaps we did a really bad job explaining what not changing the > platform means. > > I'm 99.99% certain that glib2.0 will be based on 2.12.12, just as it > was in the previous release. > Assuming I'm correctly reading the changelog there was only one change > to glib2.0, and that was to fix shlibs in debian/rules. glib2 keeps source and binary compability between releases so upgrading from 2.12.12 to 2.16.x should not even require recompiling of applications. -- JID: hrw-jabber.org OpenEmbedded developer/consultant It is your destiny. -- Darth Vader
- Previous message: Gecko version? Re: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Next message: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]