[maemo-developers] Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]
From: quim.gil at nokia.com quim.gil at nokia.comDate: Wed May 7 00:13:05 EEST 2008
- Previous message: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]
- Next message: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks for the discussion and the many good ideas. About silence, in fact a lot of it has not to do with confidentiality but lack of priority (or too many top priorities in the hands of us able to respond). What about a short term plan with common objectives: - Raise in a structured way the topics that matter to you where you feel there is a lack of response from Nokia. Now it is difficult to follow everything even to people like me spending a lot of time here, leave alone the average lead developer, project manager or product manager in the house. - Tag silences i.e. ToDo (answer will come when we have time), Planning (still undecided, working on it), Later or Depends on XXX (other events need to come first), Confidential (the stuf we really cannot talk about, probably less than you think). - Prioritize the items you want answered first. Proposal for actions: - Niels (web tools), Dave (web content) and Andre/Karsten (to be introduced officially as bugmasters) are your kind of representatives and they have lots of hours funded by Nokia to work for you. They are the ones prioritizing the tasks that are relevant to the community. Make sure they see how important is the thing you want to push. Avoid private communications unless your stuff is private: lobby here, in bugzilla, in planet maemo... - This prioritization should be visible somewhereand people should be able to impact it directly. Someone proposed to have some kind of ideastorm where the community could make visible the stuff that really matters. Voting bugs in bugzilla kind of does it but kind of not. Let's work on this, starting soon and simple - then improve. Give us the hottest topics in the main areas and let's concentrate on those. - Diablo is coming. Let's pick the components in this software release and let's make a table where packages are organized in a clear way to show where they sit in the platform and what functionality they provide. Then let's look at the closed components and let's work on the why are they closed and what is the plan about them. - Roadmapping the open source components of the platform. Should be doable in most cases, specially those libraries developers care about. -- Quim Gil marketing manager, open source maemo software @ Nokia
- Previous message: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]
- Next message: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]