[maemo-developers] Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
From: Ryan Abel rabelg5 at gmail.comDate: Tue Oct 28 16:58:43 EET 2008
- Previous message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Next message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote: > "ext Ryan Abel" <rabelg5 at gmail.com> writes: > >> So after a fair bit of discussion, we've arrive at a suitable list of >> package categories: > > Excellent! Just for completeness, what about also listing "All" and > "Others"? These need to be translated as well, but maybe it is better > to keep them out of the list. Yeah, I guess those are implied. I was avoiding putting Other on the list as I wanted to encourage people to either use a valid category, or get whatever category they want to use (and believe should be valid) onto the list, rather than having user/other as a catch-all fallback section for lazy packagers. So while they should be valid, localized sections from h-a-m's point of view, they shouldn't be valid sections for packages (I don't want to see any debs with user/other or user/all ;)). -- Ryan Abel Maemo Community Council chair
- Previous message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Next message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]