[maemo-developers] Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

From: Ryan Abel rabelg5 at gmail.com
Date: Tue Oct 28 16:58:43 EET 2008
On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:

> "ext Ryan Abel" <rabelg5 at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> So after a fair bit of discussion, we've arrive at a suitable list of
>> package categories:
>
> Excellent!  Just for completeness, what about also listing "All" and
> "Others"?  These need to be translated as well, but maybe it is better
> to keep them out of the list.


Yeah, I guess those are implied. I was avoiding putting Other on the  
list as I wanted to encourage people to either use a valid category,  
or get whatever category they want to use (and believe should be  
valid) onto the list, rather than having user/other as a catch-all  
fallback section for lazy packagers.

So while they should be valid, localized sections from h-a-m's point  
of view, they shouldn't be valid sections for packages (I don't want  
to see any debs with user/other or user/all ;)).

--
Ryan Abel
Maemo Community Council chair


More information about the maemo-developers mailing list