[maemo-developers] Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Wed Oct 29 10:22:16 EET 2008
- Previous message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Next message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Ryan Abel <rabelg5 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Glen Ditchfield wrote: > >> In the other 10 cases, the English string is the same as the tail >> end of the >> key. For consistency, could the English string in this case >> be "Development"? > > Well, it's consistent with other desktop Linux distributions. I'm not > particularly attached to either one, though. "Programming" does seem a > bit clearer for non-technical folks. What is "development" real estate > development? Development aid? New developments? Agreed. Two other points: 1) "Consistency" - with what? Why is consistency between the package maintainer's key and the displayed text /in one language/ important? 2) These are *example* English versions. Further discussions have resulted in other suggestions, like: user/multimedia Sound & Video user/navigation Location & Navigation user/utilities Accessories user/network Internet & Networking These strings are just that: examples. They are to demonstrate and further illustrate the applications which should go into each category. Once the category list is finalised, the translations in English, French, German, ... can be determined. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ maemo.org Community Council member
- Previous message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Next message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]