[maemo-developers] Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Wed Oct 29 12:58:50 EET 2008
- Previous message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Next message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Neil Jerram <neiljerram at googlemail.com> wrote: > [snip] > > Agree with all that. However, if "Programming" is a better English > term than "Development" - which I agree with - surely the section name > should be "users/programming"? Why, though? The "technical English" keys better map to upstream. There's no reason we *can't* change it, but what's the advantage? The main point I'm trying to get across is that the English translation is no more special than any other language. `user/multimedia' shouldn't be `user/sound_and_video', after all. In fact, I'd be relatively happy with `user/0001', `user/0002', `user/0003', ...: the main point of this suggestion is to ensure that it handles all the possible use cases; the i18n representations of those keys then become important; the keys themselves can be entirely arbitrary. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ maemo.org Community Council member
- Previous message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Next message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]