[maemo-developers] App manager open development
From: Marius Vollmer marius.vollmer at nokia.comDate: Thu Oct 30 16:36:40 EET 2008
- Previous message: App manager open development (was Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories)
- Next message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"ext Ryan Abel" <rabelg5 at gmail.com> writes: > On Oct 30, 2008, at 3:41 AM, Quim Gil wrote: > >> Also, would it make sense to have stable/unstable branches for >> Fremantle? Ideally there would be a stable branch accomplishing all >> the requirements and deadlines agreed with the Fremantle program, and >> then a unstable branch installable and testable on the SDK. Relevant >> additions and changes in unstable ought to be approved first >> internally before going to stable. > > This is one of the things I envisioned the community distribution > providing, but if it's integrated with Nokia's development process, > then all the better. Beta releases are something the community has > been after for a long time, so this seems like a great idea. Hopefully > the unstable branch will also be installable and testable on devices, > though, as the limited platform support of the SDK makes it hard for > some people to use it. Hmm. I wouldn't use the traditional Debian unstable / testing / stable setup here for feature experiments. Unstable/testing/stable is a integration and release process: packages usually enter it at "unstable" and eventually appear in stable. Uploading a package to unstable carries the message "This version of this package is better than the one we have in stable. It should supersede the version in stable immediately, but there might be bugs, so let's be a bit careful." It does not carry the message "Hey, here is something cool. I have know idea what I should think of it so please give me feedback." What I would prefer for feature experimentation is a branch of the package itself: make a new package with a new name and an independent integration and release schedule. Thus, in order to keep Nokia's version of the Application manager separate from the community version, the community should make a hildon-application-manager-tng package, say, and include it in the community configurations of the Maemo OS. The hildon-application-manager-tng would ideally be installable in parallel with the existing hildon-application-manager package and work well with it.
- Previous message: App manager open development (was Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories)
- Next message: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]