[maemo-developers] Transitioning to the new package categories
From: Jeremiah Foster jeremiah at jeremiahfoster.comDate: Sun Apr 19 18:42:38 EEST 2009
- Previous message: Transitioning to the new package categories
- Next message: Fremantle dialogs at maximum size
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 15, 2009, at 2:08, Ryan Abel wrote: > I've been waiting for Nokia to ship the new package categories in a > Diablo update to begin spamming maintainers to start transitioning to > the new list, but as it seems clear that this list will never ship for > Diablo, there's no point in waiting any longer.[1][2] > > I'd like to propose that we start actively transitioning to the new > categories in the beginning of May (maintainers are encouraged to > update before then, especially as it has the potential to spare you > from a bit of spam ;)). Since a lot of spam will be going out anyway, > we might want to consider using it to address some other packaging > issues at the same time. Primarily the use of Maemo-specific fields, > but also, potentially, a general auditing of all packages in Extras > (the metrics for which will have to be put together by somebody more > experienced with packaging than I). "a general audit" makes maemian (or rather the adapted lintian) the ideal candidate since that is what it is designed for. I hope I can get maemian to run over the repo soon. Then set up that audit in an automated fashion. > > So, does the transition and the timeframe sound good to everybody? > Does the auditing sound like a useful endeavor? If so, what sort of > metrics should be used? I like things like; does it build? Is it installable? Is it de- installable? Then one can move to more fine grained approaches. Jeremiah
- Previous message: Transitioning to the new package categories
- Next message: Fremantle dialogs at maximum size
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]