[maemo-developers] Double checking free/nonfree packages
From: Christopher Allan Webber cwebber at dustycloud.orgDate: Tue Dec 1 06:16:58 EET 2009
- Next message: Double checking free/nonfree packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello, I'm compiling a list on the Libre Planet wiki to determine what packages are nonfree, and what steps would need to be taken to make the n900 a fully free phone: http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/FreeMaemo While researching this list, I found some components that are currently marked as nonfree here: http://wiki.maemo.org/Documentation/Maemo_5_Developer_Guide/Architecture/Top_Level_Architecture ... but which now appear to be free software. I've compiled a list of those components as well as some notes on them. I'd like to get some confirmation before I take them off the nonfree list: <questionably-nonfree-list> Calendar-backend ---------------- Appears to be a free version of this at: http://maemo.gitorious.org/calendar-backend Gypsy daemon ------------ Appears free to me: http://gypsy.freedesktop.org/wiki/ Mission control --------------- Marked as nonfree on the graph, however irc conversation reveals: <wjt> paroneayea: MC itself is LGPL [15:13] <wjt> paroneayea: Maemo uses osso-mission-control, which is upstream MC plus some proprietary bits Any details on what these proprietary bits are, how they can be removed? rtcom-eventlogger ----------------- Apparently recently freed according to: http://cool900.blogspot.com/2009/11/closed-source-components-in-maemo-5.html Funambol SyncML --------------- Claims "Funambol is the leading mobile open source project and leading provider of open source mobile cloud sync and push email for billions of phones." https://www.forge.funambol.org/DomainHome.html If it's "open source", is it really nonfree then? Appears to be under the AGPL? https://core.forge.funambol.org/source/browse/core/trunk/LICENSE.txt?revision=28308&view=markup xml2wbxml --------- Appears to be linked to the wbxmllib project, which is under the gpl? http://sourceforge.net/projects/wbxmllib/develop CertMan ------- Appears to be free or have a free implementation? http://gitorious.org/+mer/mer/certman OpenGL ES 2.0 ------------- Can't seem to find out details about this package There appear to be some free software implementation tests here, but not really usable?: http://www.khronos.org/developers/resources/opengles/ Vincent 3d is a free software implementation? http://www.vincent3d.com/Vincent3D/index.html Hm, looks like the problem may be on the driver end: http://forum.openhandhelds.org/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=341 And it does not look likely that this is free or that it will be free soon. Okay, this one is probably certainly non-free on the driver end DSME ---- Freed according to: http://cool900.blogspot.com/2009/11/closed-source-components-in-maemo-5.htmlci (2009-11-13: DSME is in free). </questionably-nonfree-list> Any notes on this would be really appreciated, and would certainly help me improve documentation over here :) Also, does anyone have an original SVG for "Top_level_architecture.png"? If some of these components have been freed, I'd like to make their lettering black. Otherwise else I'm going to be forced to resort to pasting smiley faces next to the components that have been freed. - cwebb
- Next message: Double checking free/nonfree packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]