[maemo-developers] docs and optification
From: Attila Csipa maemo at csipa.in.rsDate: Sun Dec 13 16:37:17 EET 2009
- Previous message: docs and optification
- Next message: docs and optification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sunday 13 December 2009 15:13:54 Mustali Dalal wrote: > Purging copyright files does not seem right; they are tiny and have legal > bearing. > > Since a lot, if not all, apps currently in testing use GPL or other FOSS > license, I would guess there be good reasons to keep the copyright file > installed with the package. Would there be license violation if a copyright > file is not installed with the package? > > or is this a non-issue for developers? I'm wondering maybe we could have a license package we could depend on and then just use a softlink or something similar ? A Depends: license-gpl (>=3.0) sounds simple enough to me and then the license is crystal clear and we don't have to duplicate the license for each package and the license package can provide all the legalese. It would also simplify checking/verifying proper licensing in the autobuilder. Just a thought. Regards, Attila
- Previous message: docs and optification
- Next message: docs and optification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]