[maemo-developers] Upstart vs. sysvinit (roadmap)
From: Mika Yrjölä exploderi at gmail.comDate: Tue Jan 27 15:00:53 EET 2009
- Previous message: Upstart vs. sysvinit (roadmap)
- Next message: Upstart vs. sysvinit (roadmap)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/1/27 Eero Tamminen <eero.tamminen at nokia.com>: > Hi, > > ext Tor wrote: >> Is there a very compelling reason to move away from something as >> standard as sysvinit? I haven't even heard about "Upstart". > > Ubuntu has had Upstart since 2006: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReplacementInit > > And started using it in Feisty (i.e. two years ago): > http://packages.ubuntu.com/feisty/upstart > > In Debian it's only in experimental: > http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/upstart Of the other major distributions, I'm under the impression that at least Fedora is also using Upstart these days, so whether moving to US is a good or a bad thing (I won't take sides on that :), it's definitely not a marginal phenomena anymore.
- Previous message: Upstart vs. sysvinit (roadmap)
- Next message: Upstart vs. sysvinit (roadmap)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]