[maemo-developers] QA from extras-devel to extras-testing

[From: Dave Neary]

Hi,

Jeremiah Foster wrote:
> On May 2, 2009, at 16:11, Glen Ditchfield wrote:
>> If packages don't have to have bug trackers, then QA will have to  
>> build some
>> infrastructure to keep track of positive and negative votes, and the
>> packager's comments on the negative votes, and declarations that the  
>> problems
>> that caused the negative votes have been fixed  ... maybe it would  
>> be easier
>> to require that packages have bug trackers, and use them for QA?
> 
> Who is going to build all of this infrastructure? Won't this type of  
> requirement help create separate private repos?

Isn't this bugs.maemo.org? Is there a good reason not to use this for
Maemo packaging issues?

For bugs in the software, the individual package's bug tracker is more
appropriate - I hate to see bugs aggregate in a distribution's bug
tracking system & never make it upstream to the people who know how to
fix them.

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
maemo.org docsmaster
Email: dneary at maemo.org
Jabber: bolsh at jabber.org