[maemo-developers] ... and QA of closed source applications?
From: Jeremiah Foster jeremiah at jeremiahfoster.comDate: Wed May 6 15:46:55 EEST 2009
- Previous message: ... and QA of closed source applications?
- Next message: ... and QA of closed source applications?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On May 6, 2009, at 14:37, Quim Gil wrote: > > > ext Attila Csipa wrote: >> I think one of the key issues is not if it is possible to install >> non-free >> software, but rather to be in the clear that people *know* which >> software is, >> and which isn't free and then decide for themselves if they want it >> or not. >> In the spirit of recalling the history of the wheel, I'll mention >> the Debian >> and Ubuntu families solve this by putting them in a separate >> repository (just >> as available as the free ones). Since we already have a nokia/ >> extras split, >> this could be just as extension to that. > > Done since years ago. > > http://repository.maemo.org/extras-devel/pool/fremantle/free/ > http://repository.maemo.org/extras-devel/pool/fremantle/non-free/ > > http://repository.maemo.org/extras-devel/pool/diablo/free/ > http://repository.maemo.org/extras-devel/pool/diablo/non-free/ Yeah, of that I am aware. I just think it makes clearer with extras- devel tree and a non-free tree at the same level. > >> In the same vein, Ubuntu solves the question of 'I just ported but >> I have no >> clue how it works' with the main/universe/multiverse repo split, so >> you know >> which package is really cared for and when are you treading more >> dangerous >> waters with regard to support (this also defines where the >> bugreports go -> >> for a universe package most of the stuff will go upstream -> unlike >> packages >> in main which have maintainers/packagers who actually have the >> knowledge to >> check/fix bugs and decide if a bug is worth sending upstream or not. > > Applied to Diablo, the Ubuntu/Canonical repo structure can be more or > less mapped, in different terms > > Main > http://repository.maemo.org/pool/maemo4.1/free/ > > Restricted > http://repository.maemo.org/pool/maemo4.1/non-free/ > plus binary-only packages from catalogue.tableteer.nokia.com > > Universe > http://repository.maemo.org/extras/pool/diablo/free/ > > Multiverse > http://repository.maemo.org/extras/pool/diablo/non-free/ > > Canonical's Partner > catalogue.tableteer.nokia.com - certified Hmmm. This looks interesting, I think this kind of layout might make a lot of sense. Jeremiah
- Previous message: ... and QA of closed source applications?
- Next message: ... and QA of closed source applications?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]