[maemo-developers] QA from extras-devel to extras-testing
From: Murray Cumming murrayc at murrayc.comDate: Wed May 6 23:40:24 EEST 2009
- Previous message: QA from extras-devel to extras-testing
- Next message: QA from extras-devel to extras-testing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 19:09 +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote: > We have always known in the back of our minds that we should separate > packaging from upstream development, but it was always too much trouble > without sufficient gain if you are always making 'upstream' and package > releases at the same time anyway. The immediate gain to doing things in the standard way is mostly for others - either maemo-like alternatives such as Mer, or people using other tools, such as jhbuild. There's then some indirect gain for you as those other people help test and patch your code. Of course, I know you know this. -- murrayc at murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com
- Previous message: QA from extras-devel to extras-testing
- Next message: QA from extras-devel to extras-testing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]