[maemo-developers] QA from extras-devel to extras-testing
From: Sebastian 'CrashandDie' Lauwers crashanddie at gmail.comDate: Mon May 11 13:43:46 EEST 2009
- Previous message: QA from extras-devel to extras-testing
- Next message: QA from extras-devel to extras-testing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Jeremiah Foster <jeremiah at jeremiahfoster.com> wrote: > There is no other way. Here's why; > > 1. Too many packages - humans don't scale well. > 2. The promotion policy needs to be tested by an automated process > with proper regression and unit tests - this is a standard part of > professional quality assurance, there is no reason that maemo > shouldn't have the same professional standards. No professional company that knows two things about its business would rely on automated scripts to do regression. Regression testing and QA is done by individuals. Low-income individuals in Romania or India, maybe, but individuals nonetheless. The scripts they execute are delivered by the PM/PA covering the changes. Please don't make up arguments as you go just to suit your point of view of the day. -- question = ( to ) ? be : ! be; -- Wm. Shakespeare
- Previous message: QA from extras-devel to extras-testing
- Next message: QA from extras-devel to extras-testing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]