[maemo-developers] Does Maemo's Qt look like Hildon?
From: Murray Cumming murrayc at murrayc.comDate: Mon May 25 11:19:43 EEST 2009
- Previous message: Does Maemo's Qt look like Hildon?
- Next message: Does Maemo's Qt look like Hildon?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 23:39 +0300, Antonio Aloisio wrote: > Hi > > Although new-style Maemo 5 menus with sub-menus are > discouraged, I don't > think they should be forbidden. The current C API makes it > very > difficult to create them because HildonAppMenu is just a grid > container, > not a menu API. But I see no reason for Qt to make the same > mistake. > > Of course they would not be displayed as a tree-like menu. > > To be honest I don't know yet if we will have those menu in Qt too. > Currently I can't take other tasks, but if someone is interested in > implementing them, he/she is welcome and I'll happy to help him/her in > that job. While we are on the subject of Qt looking like Maemo without API changes, how are you dealing with the need for Maemo-specific API such as that in HildonWindow: http://maemo.org/api_refs/5.0/beta/hildon/HildonWindow.html I'm trying to get a general feel for how Qt can stick to its concept of multiple platforms without API changes, though Mameo 5 seems to be the first Qt platform with a significantly uncommon UI and API. -- murrayc at murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com
- Previous message: Does Maemo's Qt look like Hildon?
- Next message: Does Maemo's Qt look like Hildon?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]