[maemo-developers] Does Maemo's Qt look like Hildon?
From: Antonio Aloisio antonio.aloisio at gmail.comDate: Mon May 25 23:37:10 EEST 2009
- Previous message: Does Maemo's Qt look like Hildon?
- Next message: Does Maemo's Qt look like Hildon?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Attila, The python people is my mind too.. Don't worry I'm not forget about you guys. BTW please follow the ML so that you can help us in that side and you can sop us if needed... Some new Qt libs will be added.. they will be extra libs and there are not python bindings for them... Regards, Antonio On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Attila Csipa <maemo at csipa.in.rs> wrote: > On Monday 25 May 2009 12:49:58 Antonio Aloisio wrote: > > The point is that we don't want to add new "concepts" to Qt if not > strictly > > necessary. > > The idea I keep in my mind is "We are going to adapt Qt to hildon, not > > rewriting hildon with Qt". > > A tiny caveat of which you're likely already aware of - if possible, > consider > people who use Qt through bindings, like PyQt (myself included ;), Jambi, > Qyoto, etc. It would be a shame to write Qt code that would fall on it's > face > or be unusable UI-wise just because of some specific changes the bindings > are > not updated for. > _______________________________________________ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-developers at maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers > -- Samuel Goldwyn<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/s/samuel_goldwyn.html> - "For your information, I would like to ask a question." -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20090525/319122db/attachment.htm
- Previous message: Does Maemo's Qt look like Hildon?
- Next message: Does Maemo's Qt look like Hildon?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]