[maemo-developers] Problems with the fremantle autobuilder...
From: Anderson Lizardo anderson.lizardo at openbossa.orgDate: Tue May 26 14:53:57 EEST 2009
- Previous message: Problems with the fremantle autobuilder...
- Next message: Problems with the fremantle autobuilder...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Niels Breet <niels at maemo.org> wrote: >> This morning I got an email, it says >> that the packages have been rejected and they won't be moved in the >> repository because the version (5.0_5.0.32-7etch6maemo3) is minor of the >> current [3] version available in the repository ( 5.0.32-7etch6maemo2 ). >> Then that's very strange.. what packages have compared the script running >> on the autobuilder? > > It seems that the version comparison used by BuildMe doesn't understand > the long version number. (7etch6maemo3) I'd need to find out if such > numbers are intended to be supported or that they are illegal. At least dpkg understands it correctly: $ dpkg --compare-versions 5.0.32-7etch6maemo2 lt 5.0.32-7etch6maemo3 && echo TRUE || echo FALSE TRUE $ dpkg --compare-versions 5.0.32-7etch6maemo3 lt 5.0.32-7etch6maemo2 && echo TRUE || echo FALSE FALSE But looking at the error message sent to the extras-cauldron list for Antonio's package, it seems that the autobuilder is actually detecting that the package was already accepted, which is not true. I suppose that if a package is rejected, we can upload it with the same version number ? Requiring to increment the version on each failed/rejected upload would seem strange IMHO :) Regards, -- Anderson Lizardo OpenBossa Labs - INdT Manaus - Brazil
- Previous message: Problems with the fremantle autobuilder...
- Next message: Problems with the fremantle autobuilder...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]