[maemo-developers] Autobuilder broken or what?
From: Jeremiah Foster jeremiah at jeremiahfoster.comDate: Tue May 26 14:59:14 EEST 2009
- Previous message: Autobuilder broken or what?
- Next message: Autobuilder broken or what?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On May 26, 2009, at 13:12, Antonio Aloisio wrote: > Hi Jeremiah, > Hi Antonio! :) > > On a side note, why are you including 'etch' in the version of your > package? And for that matter, dfsg? > That's the original package name. IIRC the policy says that I have > to leave the original name and append the maemoN suffix > if I've modified the package.. Is it true? I keep a copy of the Maemo packaging policy in dead tree format right next to me, so let me check. If your package is re-packaged for maemo a maemo revision MUST be appended, but you do not have to keep the etch specific part. So it might look like mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-0maemo3. Furthermore I cannot find a package called mysql-dfsg in debian's package search tool: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=mysql-dfsg&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all Where does this package come from? Is it the client or server part of mysql? Or both? Jeremiah
- Previous message: Autobuilder broken or what?
- Next message: Autobuilder broken or what?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]