[maemo-developers] QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
From: David Greaves david at dgreaves.comDate: Mon Nov 2 23:12:31 EET 2009
- Previous message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Next message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Andrew Flegg <andrew at bleb.org> wrote: > Alan wrote: > > Grrr! > > > > I hate that kind of talk. It only makes the problem worse. > What problem? This mailing list has a higher concentration of > involved (and affected) developers than talk. You can have an > intelligent discussion here without it devolving into petty > spats or rampaging off topic. This is the official mailing > list for the development of (and developers for) Maemo. [corrected the top-posting] On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 12:07 -0800, Qole wrote: > Your reply continues to sound like the middle class moms who argue for > private schools. How will our children ever get ahead if they go to > that school down the street? It is full of common children who will > only slow our gifted children down. Hmm, your argument sounds like something from talk :) ie it's not technical, not related to the objective and just invites a massive off-topic debate; all fine in a casual conversation but not in a focussed discussion. I'd suggest that the barrier to entry for a mailing list cf talk is substantially less than the barrier to entry of a private school. Anyone from talk is welcome to join the list provided they plan on engaging in development oriented discussions (and yes, they do meander - no-one cares *that* much). David
- Previous message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Next message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]