[maemo-developers] Autobuilder repository priority ?
From: Jeremiah Foster jeremiah at jeremiahfoster.comDate: Mon Nov 2 23:52:48 EET 2009
- Previous message: Autobuilder repository priority ?
- Next message: Autobuilder repository priority ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:27, Ed Bartosh wrote: > 2009/11/2 Jeremiah Foster <jeremiah at jeremiahfoster.com>: >> >> On Nov 1, 2009, at 18:05, Ed Bartosh wrote: > >>> Idea of having separate queue for Extras updates sounds more >>> promising >>> to me. Developers might become confused with all this set of >>> repositories, queues and processes, but the idea is good. I support >>> this. >>> > What about this? Can we have separate queue for updates? Any other > ideas? Can you explain how this might work and it's advantages? I am not against it aside from the fact that I think another repo is confusing. Is the proposal to create a repo called extras-updates which would hold only updates to software that has already existed in the repos? I don't see how that is different from just updating the existing package with new software. If you want to pull in different version numbers than what exists why would you need a separate repo? I think this is adding complexity - and we are in danger of having too much complexity already. >>>> >>>> In case of overlapping SDK/Extras I can't think of a satisfactory >>>> solution as >>>> then fixes for the latter would appear as fixes for the former, >>>> which is wrong >>>> and dangerous. Another issue would be that you would not be getting >>>> SDK >>>> updates if you have extras or extras-updates disabled, which is >>>> very >>>> counterintuitive. >>>> >>> True. I also don't see any more or less acceptable solution for >>> this. >> >> Having a single repo for each distro would be ideal, with _all_ the >> software required to run the device in the repo. Then we can co- >> ordinate the release as a single, monolithic repository. I know this >> is wishful thinking because not everything is licensed to allow this, >> but if we could get as much as possible in a single location, then we >> make life easier for developers. >> > Sounds like a long-term plan. > Attila was asking us to solve problem with updates. And he proposed > good solution. Shell we implement it right now or you propose to wait > until we have Maemo distro and all this great things? No, let's try and solve his proposal now. I am open to whatever people think is best, I don't want to stand in the way of a new repository if others think it is the right path to choose. Jeremiah
- Previous message: Autobuilder repository priority ?
- Next message: Autobuilder repository priority ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]