[maemo-developers] QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Tue Nov 3 16:38:42 EET 2009
- Previous message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Next message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 14:34, Frank Banul <frank.banul at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Andrew Flegg <andrew at bleb.org> wrote: >> >> Except how do you try to prevent abuse (whether intentional or >> accidental)? At least with the version number you've got some safety >> check (although it is in no way comprehensive). It also requires more >> changes at more levels (I bet), so harder to implement. > > I don't see the difference between the safety of version numbers or > check boxes on the promotion page since I control both. Version numbers are more visible? It's easier to lie when no-one will know about it (unless we percolate "this is a minor upgrade over 0.2.2" all through the website). It's easier to check a checkbox for a semi-major release whereas version numbers are something more sacrosanct (at least to me). However, as I said, bigger reason is that it'll be easier to implement :-) Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/
- Previous message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Next message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]