[maemo-developers] QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
From: tero.kojo at nokia.com tero.kojo at nokia.comDate: Wed Nov 4 11:03:52 EET 2009
- Previous message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Next message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew Flegg wrote. > > Jeremiah wrote: > > > > Shall we put a checkbox by the package promotion page, or somewhere > > where we remember, which keeps all accrued karma? > > That's probably a good first step, however I wonder if long > term something like Marius suggested might be better: > remaining karma for an app is... > > * proportional to current app karma > * proportional to developer's karma > * proportional to testers' karma > * inversely proportional to the time between > last build and this build. > > This'd mean that if I released an app and had it voted up by > Ryan, Tim, Daniel, Quim and a few others on the first karma > page; and I released a new version the next day (short time > => probable bug fix); my app might only lose one or two points. > > Maybe this works for time too (or vote by high roller reduces > time?) Or maybe it's just too complicated? Too complicated. I start testing an application that I pick from extras-testing (a repository that is enabled on my device). I do my tests, am happy and go press a thumbs up. Two days later I notice a blinking orange light in my status bar. I see a new version of the application. I install, I check what has changed (minor or major?), I run my tests and thumb it up again. I didn't loose too many minutes or hours of my life, no one got killed or injured, and the punitive damages to all parties appear to be zero. Life's good and I get a cup of coffee. In other words, I test applications that I use or leave on device. It's not something I do randomly. I believe that the author of the app has committed to the app, so in return I commit to it as well. The rules and process are a good thing, but in the end it is people who do the things. No matter if it is the developer, the tester or the user, it's about the people. Tero > Thoughts welcome. > > Cheers, > > Andrew > > -- > Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ >
- Previous message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Next message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]