[maemo-developers] maemo-optify, autobuilder & /opt
From: Ed Bartosh bartosh at gmail.comDate: Fri Nov 6 12:45:48 EET 2009
- Previous message: maemo-optify, autobuilder & /opt
- Next message: maemo-optify, autobuilder & /opt
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/11/5 Ed Bartosh <bartosh at gmail.com>: > 2009/11/5 Marius Vollmer <marius.vollmer at nokia.com>: >> ext Ed Bartosh <bartosh at gmail.com> writes: >> >>> 2009/11/5 Marius Vollmer <marius.vollmer at nokia.com>: >>> >>>> Then I propose to put maemo-optify into the sdk repo, add a dependency >>>> to it from build-essential and make a new SDK release. >>>> >>>> Whenever we need to update maemo-optify, we need to make a new >>>> rootstrap. >>>> >>> It would take a lot of time, I think. >>> I've discussed this with sbdmock author and we decided to make small change to sbdmock: New configurable action will be introduced. This action will be executed by sbdmock between unpacking rootstrap and installing build-deps. For Fremantle we can simply put 'apt-get install maemo-optify' in there. I'll try to make this change on weekends and deploy new sbdmock and devkit in production. It would be nice If somebody could explain me what should I expect from maemo-optify in the following cases: - source package doesn't contain anything /opt specific, binary package doesn't contain /opt - source package doesn't contain debian/optify, binary package doesn't contain /opt - source package doesn't contain debian/optify, one binary package doesn't contain /opt, another binary package does - source package contains debian/optify, binary package contains /opt - source package contains debian/optify, one binary package contains /opt, another binary package doesn't .... Thanks, -- BR, Ed
- Previous message: maemo-optify, autobuilder & /opt
- Next message: maemo-optify, autobuilder & /opt
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]