[maemo-developers] Quality Assurance and Extras-testing discussion on IRC
From: Henrik Hedberg henrik.hedberg at innologies.fiDate: Fri Nov 6 14:54:01 EET 2009
- Previous message: Quality Assurance and Extras-testing discussion on IRC
- Next message: Quality Assurance and Extras-testing discussion on IRC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marius Vollmer wrote: > ext Graham Cobb <g+770 at cobb.uk.net> writes: > >> Reporting all bugs found is great. But only "dangerous" issues should >> cause blockages. > > My gut feeling is that a specific bug report should always be required > to block a package from entering Extras. Finally someone got it! ;) > We can modify that to be "A package can pass into Extras when it has > less critical bugs reported than the version currently in Extras (or > both have zero), and we have been looking hard enough to be confident > that no further critical issues are hiding." Yes, yes. Yes, please. I second to that. > So, hmm, I think this all means that I want developers and testers to > have karma, not packages. A developer with high karma would be able to > push packages through the process faster, and a high rolling tester > would be able keep bugs open and classified as critical in case of > disagreement. Very good addition. BR, Henrik -- Henrik Hedberg - http://www.henrikhedberg.net/
- Previous message: Quality Assurance and Extras-testing discussion on IRC
- Next message: Quality Assurance and Extras-testing discussion on IRC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]