[maemo-developers] debhelper-maemo-package-icons
From: Gabriel Schulhof nix at go-nix.caDate: Tue Nov 10 15:50:47 EET 2009
- Previous message: debhelper-maemo-package-icons
- Next message: debhelper-maemo-package-icons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hey! On Tue, November 10, 2009 14:59, Marius Vollmer wrote: > ext David King <davidk at openismus.com> writes: >> You mean 48x48 pixels, right? >> http://wiki.maemo.org/Documentation/Maemo_5_Developer_Guide/Packaging%2C_Deploying_and_Distributing#Icons > > Ouch, somebody needs to be tickled to death for this. (Maybe me for not > catching this earlier.) Assuming that person is ticklish ... > Why do people think the field is named Maemo-Icon-26. Twenty-six. > Rings a bell? Hmm? Like, 26x26 pixels? Could there be a connection? > > Anyway, trying to fix this seems to be moot. Christ. Kids these days. *sigh* ... what can you do. Anyway, you can take any file and call it debian/package-name.png and it will uuencode it and it will append it to the debian/control section named Package: package-name ... No file type/pixel size checks are performed on the debian/package-name.png file. I, for one, will stick to 26x26, because older version of Hildon Application Manager do not work with higher rez icons, and I don't want yet another reason to split my source package along distro lines. As for why we chose an odd size like 26x26 to begin with, instead of 24x24 or 32x32, I will never understand. But that is a story for another time ... Gabriel
- Previous message: debhelper-maemo-package-icons
- Next message: debhelper-maemo-package-icons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]