[maemo-developers] QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
From: Marius Vollmer marius.vollmer at nokia.comDate: Wed Nov 11 16:29:55 EET 2009
- Previous message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Next message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ext Thomas Perl <th.perl at gmail.com> writes: > The following is a rant about XB-Maemo-Upgrade-Description > with some suggestions for improvement... Yeah, as soon as I 'invented' it, I could see how it is not going to work very well. I actually think it is best to ignore this field. > My suggestion is to either use the Debian changelog, or if this sounds > too "technical" for the end user, agree on some way to mark > "user-relevant" changes in the Debian changelog (by using "USER:" as a > prefix for a one-line summary or by having a convention of having the > first entry in the Debian changelog be a user-friendly summary of all > changes) and then parse the changelog and display all user-relevant > changes in the AppMgr. Yes, we pretty much have to have a full list of changes and the Application manager then can display the relevant ones. The apt-listchanges program does this for Debian.
- Previous message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Next message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]