[maemo-developers] (Fremantle) libqt4-core vs libqtcore4

[From: Antonio Aloisio]

Hi,
Since debian/control files use placeholders for the binary dependencies that
are
filled during the building process there aren't compatibility issues.

Br,
Antonio

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Alex Myodov <amyodov at gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe, an opposite direction package (libqtcore4 that depends on
> libqt4-core) should be added then for compatibility, shouldn't it?
>
> Anyway, seems strange to have a different convention for the similar
> (4.5) versions in Diablo and Fremantle.
>
>
> Antonio Aloisio wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Maybe because having libqt4-<Qt Module> is logic and clean.
> >
> > Note: I'm not the maintainer of these packages.
> >
> > Br,
> > Antonio
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Alex Myodov <amyodov at gmail.com
> > <mailto:amyodov at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hello,
> >
> >     I recently noticed that Freemantle SDK contains the QT packages with
> >     outdated naming scheme only; libqt4-core package is available and
> stores
> >     the libraries. Though Debian (as well as Diablo SDK, as the people
> >     confirmed on IRC) has the new scheme, where the libraries are stored
> in
> >     libqtcore4 while libqt4-core being the transitional package and
> having
> >     the "depends" on libqtcore4.
> >     Is anyone aware of any obscure reasons for that, and may/will it
> change
> >     in Freemantle to be compliant with the other packages?
>
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-developers mailing list
> maemo-developers at maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
>



-- 

Jonathan Swift<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/jonathan_swift.html>
- "May you live every day of your life."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20091007/b97565ec/attachment.htm