[maemo-developers] Optifing - Clarification Requested
From: Kamen Bundev bundyo at gmail.comDate: Sun Oct 18 15:32:11 EEST 2009
- Previous message: Optifing - Clarification Requested
- Next message: Optifing - Clarification Requested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
There is libicu in extras-devel already, but it is not optified. libicu is around 16MB+, so it better be. It won't get through testing with that size. Regards: Bundyo On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Nathan Anderson <nathan at andersonsplace.net>wrote: > Ok, I believe I have read all the messages; the talk thread and the wiki; > and I'm still a bit confused because of python issues. > > I will be pushing several libraries that are in the end depended upon by a > custom swig generated python binding that a python app will be using. > > Basically: > > Lib-Sword -> (depends on) > lib-ICU > Lib-Clucene > lib-Curl (Already on device I believe) > > Now I will be generating a python binding to the Sword library and it > generates a "_Sword.so" which the python app will use to handle everything. > > Now for Optifing question: > 1. can I optify Clucene, & ICU? > 2. can I optify the main libsword? > 3. do I optify the _Sword.so? > > And what exactly do I need to do to set these as being or not being > optified. > > I have everything running fine on the SDK. Basically I need to know the > packaging requirement to put them into Extras-testing. > > Nathan > > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-developers at maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20091018/753d0094/attachment.htm
- Previous message: Optifing - Clarification Requested
- Next message: Optifing - Clarification Requested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]