[maemo-developers] extras-testing and WONTFIX ?
From: Quim Gil quim.gil at nokia.comDate: Mon Oct 26 09:39:27 EET 2009
- Previous message: extras-testing and WONTFIX ?
- Next message: extras-testing and WONTFIX ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ext Till Harbaum / Lists wrote: > Hi, > > Am Samstag 24 Oktober 2009 schrieb Andrew Flegg: >> The QA criteria aren't very stringent and can be summed up as "play >> nice, don't waste battery, try to use /opt". Any package which gets 10 >> thumbs up can be promoted. So, in your hypothetical case, a if the >> developer won't fix a bug but 10 people still think it's worthy of >> going into Extras, the developer will have that opportunity. > In fact exactly that happened with "gpxview". The fremantle port > uses a gtknotebook with "bottom" tabs. This isn't themed and is a > WONTFIX in fremantle (and not documented anywhere, btw) and > looks a little bit odd. But it i got the permission to move it to > extras, anyway. Looks like a non-blocker: http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing/QA_Checklist#Non-blockers "Developers are encouraged to adopt the Maemo 5 UI guidelines and optimize their application to finger use. However, lack of Maemo 5 UI optimization is not a reason to block an application in its way to Extras unless it is unusable even with stylus." -- Quim Gil open source advocate Maemo Devices @ Nokia
- Previous message: extras-testing and WONTFIX ?
- Next message: extras-testing and WONTFIX ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]