[maemo-developers] QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
From: Andrea Grandi a.grandi at gmail.comDate: Sat Oct 31 22:06:09 EET 2009
- Previous message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Next message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, 2009/10/31 Attila Csipa <maemo at csipa.in.rs>: > There is a definitely a conflict there. I support Jeremiah's suggestion that > minor packaging/typo fixes that do not alter app functionality (e.g. when you > go from 1.0-maemo0 to 1.0-maemo1) should not reset app karma. Should require > some discipline so people would not abuse this, but still better than forcing > releases to be spaced 10+ days no matter how large the changes or how simple > the fix. even more important: what if developer/users find a security bug that should really be fixed as soon as possible? In a normal Linux distribution, patched package is released and available after few hours. Here it would pass lot of time before final user can apply the patch. -- Andrea Grandi email: a.grandi [AT] gmail [DOT] com website: http://www.andreagrandi.it PGP Key: http://www.andreagrandi.it/pgp_key.asc
- Previous message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Next message: QA process = bug fixing disincentive?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]